fbpx
Advertisements

Do we really need the word, "functionality?"

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #173002

      ErinO
      Member
      • Topics - 9
      • Replies - 795
      • Total Posts - 804

      Can someone give me an example where the word function/functions doesn’t work in a sentence the same way functionality does?

    • #246113

      adiffer
      Participant
      • Topics - 179
      • Replies - 9,504
      • Total Posts - 9,683

      At work I have a function I fill and functionality I provide.

      If one asks ‘What do you do?’ one can answer with a function.
      If one asks ‘What do you do for others?’ one can answer with what one provides.

      I see one as part of the other, but almost the same.

    • #246116

      ErinO
      Member
      • Topics - 9
      • Replies - 795
      • Total Posts - 804

      Hmmmm….

    • #246115

      LC
      Participant
      • Topics - 641
      • Replies - 7,148
      • Total Posts - 7,789

      Agree with Al. My widget 2.5 provides me superior functionality over the 2.1 version. Both functions and functionality are nouns so either may be used, IMO, but using “functions” would require an additional preposition (“with”), I believe. Direct answer to the question I believe is “no,” but the use of the phrase is a proper option.

    • #246114

      adiffer
      Participant
      • Topics - 179
      • Replies - 9,504
      • Total Posts - 9,683

      When dealing with English vocabulary the lesson is that we COULD do away with a lot of words, but we make them up in order to express fine variations of meaning or to turn a few words into one. In German one might squash adjectives onto a noun to make what an English speaker would think of as one word. We do this a lot with new single and hypenated words. A typical approach in English, though, is to alter prefixes and suffixes.

      One can easily do away with most of the English vocabulary and function just fine in the world, but why would we want to do that? Language is what we want it to be. Popular word variations survive through use. Old variations get demoted and eventually can be found only in classic literature. I ran across ‘wheresoforth’ the other day in a book I was reading. Can you guess the century it was written? It is easy enough to understand from context, but who uses it anymore? 8)

Viewing 4 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.