Old Town Facade Improvements Plan

This topic contains 7 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  plasmadrive 2 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #177013

    EGL Admin
    Member
    • Topics - 3,082
    • Replies - 21,888
    • Total Posts - 24,970

    Last year the city set up a grant for old town businesses to improve their buildings and the city would help pay for some of it. The problem is that the city requires you to hire contractors that pay a prevailing wage. Our office needed a new roof. We received some bids from various contractors,. none of which pay the prevailing wage. The bids varied from $9000 to $15,000. I have to assume that a prevailing wage would have made it that much higher. Why would a business pay more for the work to receive a portion of it back from the city? If we paid $15,000 instead of $9000, we wouldn’t get enough back to make it worth it. Not sure why the city would require prevailing wage on someone else’s business just to receive a grant. I can see for their own work on their buildings or bids.

  • #291874

    newmom
    Participant
    • Topics - 206
    • Replies - 6,205
    • Total Posts - 6,411

    Why? Pressure from the unions. That’s all it takes.

  • #291870

    EGL Admin
    Member
    • Topics - 3,082
    • Replies - 21,888
    • Total Posts - 24,970

    I think it’s a state law, so that would make sense. Kind of defeats the purpose of the grant then. Not really worth it to pay $5000 more to get that much or less back.

  • #291875

    plasmadrive
    Participant
    • Topics - 88
    • Replies - 885
    • Total Posts - 973

    Look up Davis-Bacon and you will see why the gov can’t do anything for a reasonable cost.

    They can do prevailing wage, but they have to certify their payroll if I remember correctly..

  • #291871

    EGL Admin
    Member
    • Topics - 3,082
    • Replies - 21,888
    • Total Posts - 24,970

    Most local companies don’t do it.

    We had to pay $1000 to have it reviewed by some historical commission to okay the roof. Ridiculous.

  • #291876

    plasmadrive
    Participant
    • Topics - 88
    • Replies - 885
    • Total Posts - 973

    Look up Davis-Bacon and you will see why the gov can’t do anything for a reasonable cost.
    “A. The prevailing wage rate is the basic hourly rate paid on public works projects to a majority of workers engaged in a particular craft, classification or type of work within the locality and in the nearest labor market area (if a majority of such workers are paid at a single rate).”

    But if you actually look at prevailing wage you will see that it is more tied to the minority of union workers plus some $$…. It is ridiculous. The union represents such a small percentage of tradesmen that it is way out of bounce.. at least in the electrical trade. My numbers may be off by now but years ago the union only represented < 25% in the electrical trade.

    They can do prevailing wage, but they have to certify their payroll if I remember correctly.. Bottom line is that it is most likely not worth your accepting the money from the city

  • #291877

    plasmadrive
    Participant
    • Topics - 88
    • Replies - 885
    • Total Posts - 973

    @EGL Admin 123488 wrote:

    Most local companies don’t do it.

    We had to pay $1000 to have it reviewed by some historical commission to okay the roof. Ridiculous.

    yep.. that is the kind of stuff that pisses people off about how the city runs some things. It’s a damn roof for crying out loud..

  • #291872

    EGL Admin
    Member
    • Topics - 3,082
    • Replies - 21,888
    • Total Posts - 24,970

    And there was confusion on the process because the grant application was different than the historical commission process. We received an email saying we were good to go, then after we had the roof done and submitted it to the city, they said we shouldn’t have done it yet because they didn’t approve the grant yet. Then they asked about the prevailing wage stuff. What a waste of time.

  • #291873

    joy
    Participant
    • Topics - 99
    • Replies - 3,934
    • Total Posts - 4,033

    @newmom 123455 wrote:

    Why? Pressure from the unions. That’s all it takes.

    Yep.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.